← Back to blog

July 2, 2024

How Display Gate Guard Finds the Bad Apples in Your Display Ads

Eight dimensions we analyze to identify problematic placements — from brand safety to ad density.

Selecting the right websites for your display advertising has a direct impact on campaign performance, brand perception, and actual ROI. Broad targeting on Google Display Network means your ads can run on tens of thousands of sites. Most of them are fine. Some of them aren't. Finding the bad ones at scale is the problem we built DisplayGateGuard to solve.

Here are the dimensions we analyze.

1. Controversial Content

Polarizing or contentious content creates unintended brand associations even when it doesn't meet the threshold for "unsafe." We flag sites where the editorial stance could undermine your brand's position in the market.

2. Hyperpolitical and Extremist Sites

Divisive political content is a distinct category from general controversy. Sites that take extreme ideological positions — regardless of which direction — represent reputational risk for most brands. We identify them and flag them for review.

3. Adult Content

Sites with adult-oriented content may reach audiences outside your target demographic and create perception problems regardless of audience match. Most brands want to exclude these entirely.

4. Firearms and Weapons Sites

Depending on your brand values and audience, firearms-focused sites may be unsuitable. We identify them so you can make an explicit inclusion or exclusion decision rather than discovering the placement in an audit six months later.

5. Children's Content

Age-appropriate placement is a suitability concern in both directions. Sites targeting children may not suit adult products, and some brands specifically want to include or exclude them for legal or ethical reasons.

6. Gambling and Gaming Sites

Gaming and gambling platforms carry associations that affect some brands disproportionately. We flag them for review, particularly for financial services, health, and family-focused brands.

7. Made-for-Advertising Sites

The largest budget-draining category. We analyze: content depth, article quality, clickbait signal, ad density, author credibility, and engagement indicators. Sites that score poorly on MFA dimensions get flagged for exclusion.

8. Ad-to-Content Ratio

This is a direct quality signal. A page where ads outnumber content paragraphs is not a content page — it's an ad inventory page. We calculate the ratio and weight it in our scoring.

What You Get

Every domain in your placement report gets a score across these dimensions. You see which sites are safe, which need review, and which to exclude immediately. The output is an exclusion list you can apply directly in Google Ads — account-wide, as of January 2026.

Ready to clean your placement list?

Analyze your GDN placements for free. 100 credits on signup, no credit card.